NEC MultiSync 24WMGX3 24" widescreen LCD

Written by Tim Smalley

October 23, 2008 | 17:16

Tags: #24-inch #display #evaluation #image #lcd #monitor #multisync #objective #performance #quality #review #subjective #tft #widescreen

Companies: #nec #test

Subjective Image Quality Analysis

In addition to the battery of targeted tests, we also tested the 24WMGX3 in a selection of more real-world scenarios. This was done using a pair of displays cloned (the pretty accurate LCD2690WUXi was the second display) in our graphics card driver – we tested the 24WMGX3's performance by editing photos, watching video, gaming on both the PC and Xbox 360, browsing the Internet and also writing this review.

Out of the box, we found that the MultiSync 24WMGX3's sharpness was, well, too sharp but there were no visual artifacts around black text on a white background. Thankfully, the company includes sharpness adjusting capabilities in the OSD menu – the default setting is 50 percent sharpness, but we found 19.6 percent sharpness delivered the best results, but you may find your own preferences are different to mine.

Image editing was great, but it wasn't excellent – white saturation was a problem when we were manipulating the images we've used in this article. All of our studio shots are taken on a white background and we found some very slight differences between the 24WMGX3 and the 2690 that didn't go in the 24WMGX3's favour – it was just a little less accurate and it was by no means criminally so. When it came to editing images we'd taken during a walk around Virginia Water Lake last weekend, there were no such problems – the only slight blemish is white saturation, as was evident in our synthetic tests.


Watching video and playing games using the MultiSync 24WMGX3 was awesome – not only were the images vivid and vibrant, but there was no visible banding, ghosting or input lag. Burnout Paradise looked stunning over both HDMI and Component connections and, because it's a high-speed game, we gave the MP Modes a try.

NEC incorporates three MP Modes into the 24WMGX3 and according to the manual, they're designed to reproduce moving images clearly with "suppressed blurriness and reduced shaking, even for fast moving images." It does this by inserting black frames, which consequently makes the screen look darker and duller. The one we found the best was Level1, which is designed for moving images with little movement – for the game we were playing, Level3 should have been the most ideal, but it wasn't.

What's more, when we tried it again while playing Trackmania United on the PC, we felt a slight headache coming on after a few minutes because of the slight flicker that's more apparent at shorter distances – it was only acceptable when we sat further away from the screen. And despite Level1 being acceptable while playing games while sitting back from our desk, we felt that turning black frame insertion off actually made things look better and more vibrant – we didn't turn it back on again.


In addition to Burnout and Trackmania, we roamed around the African savannah that is Far Cry 2 for a couple of hours – it looked simply stunning, although we would have preferred the game to have implemented widescreen in a different way. We'll save that diatribe for another day, though.

Final Thoughts...

Overall, then, NEC's MultiSync 24WMGX3 gets most things right and delivers some great image quality without evidence of input lag. All is not perfect though, as you may experience some slight ghosting in certain fast moving scenarios and white saturation isn't as good as it could be.

Some of the additional features are useful, but others aren't so useful – the remote is an interesting inclusion and it really dictates the direction of the 24WMGX3. And as an entertainment and productivity hub, it works pretty well thanks to its huge array of connectivity options. Some would argue that there's no use for all of these inputs, but if you've got your PC, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii all in your bedroom, it’s an ideal solution that doesn't compromise on the image quality front.

Probably its only downfall is the MultiSync 24WMGX3's price – it's over £620 (including VAT) at the time of writing and that makes it quite an expensive albeit desirable monitor. For that price, we'd expect a 24-inch monitor to do something special, especially when BenQ's excellent FP241W is available for well under £450 these days and that has almost as many input options as the 24WMGX3.

Ultimately, the NEC MultiSync 24WMGX3 monitor gets very close to being the best 24-inch monitor for gamers and enthusiasts, but the minor image quality niggles are enough for us to not make a solid recommendation when it's nearly £180 more than a monitor that took the market by storm almost two years ago. It's good, but it's not quite that good.

  • Features
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • 10/10
  • Image Quality
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • -
  • 9/10
  • Value
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • -
  • -
  • -
  • -
  • 6/10
  • Overall
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • x
  • -
  • -
  • 8/10
What do these scores mean?
Discuss this in the forums

Posted by Jasio - Thu Oct 23 2008 16:32

Apart from the remote, and the extra HDMI port -- this isn't all that impressive. The BenQ FP241W that Bit-Tech reviewed over a year ago had similar/better specs than this monitor and I bought it a year ago for $800 CDN. So what's so great about this monitor? Nothing really imo. It's just a "solid performer" -- but then again, there's quite a few of those out there already. This is one of those "Oh cool, that's a good quality LCD but meh" kinda deal.

The price tag is a kick in the bean-bag though. $1200? Ouch.

Posted by Tim S - Thu Oct 23 2008 16:35

Jasio
Apart from the remote, and the extra HDMI port -- this isn't all that impressive. The BenQ FP241W that Bit-Tech reviewed over a year ago had similar/better specs than this monitor and I bought it a year ago for $800 CDN. So what's so great about this monitor? Nothing really imo. It's just a "solid performer" -- but then again, there's quite a few of those out there already. This is one of those "Oh cool, that's a good quality LCD but meh" kinda deal.
It's a good quality monitor and probably an equal to the BenQ in terms of image quality - it's a long time since we looked at that display though. We reviewed the BenQ almost 2 years ago now and I'd still recommend that above this to be honest - I'm seriously thinking of getting one for myself, frankly. Had we been scoring back in November 2006, the BenQ FP241W would have come very close to straight 10s because it was simply an amazing product at the time - well ahead of anything else out there.

The price tag is a kick in the bean-bag though. $1200? Ouch.
The price is definitely a kicker, you're right, but I don't think it'd be as expensive as you're suggesting in North America, because the UK price quoted includes tax. I'd imagine it'd less than $900 before tax and, in Canada, it'll be around $1050 CAD.

Posted by mrb_no1 - Thu Oct 23 2008 16:49

kinda with jasio and bit tech on this one really. i like the addition of the remote though, that is a nice idea and as for looks, its the nicest lcd monitor i've seen but will not tempt me at that price. i'll wait a month, save a little extra and buy a 30" dell or something instead as for my screen estate buck the larger moniter is better money....especially seen as my cheap 2nd lcd is on the fritz, time for sell the 20.1" dell and move to something bigger, not this new nec though.

peace

fatman

Posted by Hustler - Thu Oct 23 2008 17:05

WTF!!!!!......£600+ and you dont even get a Portrait mode.

If your into 2d vertical shooters with MAME like me, Portrait mode is a must....
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.